|
Oklahoma State Senate |
|
|
|
|
Issue Background In 1997, the Legislature addressed concerns about promoting children's best interests against parental rights in grandparental visitation matters through enactment of provisions that require a court to consider several factors(1) in determining the best interest of the child. In 1998, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma found that a provision of the grandparent-visitation laws(2) violated the constitutionally protected interest of parents to raise their children without undue state interference in cases that involve intact families whose care for their children has never been questioned or suspect.(3) The Court also asserted that to reach the issue of the child's "best interest" there must be a requisite showing of harm, or threat of harm, to bring the issue before the court or some instance of death or divorce which brings the child's domestic situation within the province of the court. In other contexts such as visitation upon termination of parental rights, divorce, death of a parent, paternity and adoption, the statute has been upheld and grandparental visitation has been allowed if the court finds the visitation to be in the best interest of the child. The 2000 Legislature responded to constitutional concerns by enacting House Bill 1983. This measure tailored the language of the statute to allow grandparents to seek and be granted visitation rights, independent of a parent's right of visitation, if it is in the best interest of the child and another specified triggering event has occurred or is occurring, for example, a divorce between the child's parents is pending before the court. On June 5, 2000, the United States Supreme Court rendered a decision in the closely watched grandparental visitation matter of Troxel v. Granville, No. 99-138. In that case, the Washington statute that the Troxels sought to invoke allows "any person" to petition for visitation rights "at any time" and allowed the court to order visitation rights when "visitation may serve the best interest of the child." The Court found the Washington State nonparental visitation statute "breathtakingly broad." However, the Justices did not consider the primary constitution question passed on by the Washington Supreme Court - whether the Due Process Clause requires all nonparental visitation statutes to include a showing of harm or potential harm to the child as a condition precedent to granting visitation. It does not appear that the Court's opinion in Troxel will have a significant impact in Oklahoma since the Justices did not consider the Due Process Clause issue. Additionally, Oklahoma grandparental-visitation laws are not as expansive as Washington's. States are experimenting with a variety of ways to promote children's best interests against parental rights in grandparental visitation matters as the number of skipped-generation caretakers increase. Summary of Actions
Grandparental Visitation
This measure also provides for process for cases of denial of or interference with grandparental visitation rights. 1 In determining the
best interest of the minor child, the court shall consider: 1. The willingness
of the grandparent or grandparents to encourage a close relationship
between the child and the parent or parents; 2. The length and quality
of the prior relationship between the child and the grandparent or grandparents;
3. The preference of the child if the child is determined to be of sufficient
maturity to express a preference; 4. The mental and physical health
of the child; 5. The mental and physical health of the grandparent or
grandparents; and 6. Such other factors as are necessary in the particular
circumstances. See 10 O.S. Supp. §5 (D).
|
![]()
| Legislative Brief Index |