|
DOWNSIZING GOVERNMENT IN OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma Has Downsized
More Quickly Than Many More Highly Publicized States
Downsizing state government
has become both a political and economic imperative. A
number of states have garnered much national attention for
their efforts at improving performance and government
downsizing. The New Governor's Commission on Government
Performance has pointed to Texas and North Carolina as
models for the Commission's work. Other states that have
been highlighted in the briefing materials for the
Governor's Performance Commission include: Louisiana, South
Carolina, Wisconsin and Iowa.
Oklahoma Is One Of
Only Eight States To Reduce State Employment
Oklahoma has a better track
record at downsizing than any of these highly publicized
states according the January 1995 issue of State
Policy Reports. Oklahoma was one of only 8 states
nationally that reduced employment in the period of November
1990 to November 1995. All of the states cited in
preliminary Performance Commission materials actually
increased state employment in that period.
- Oklahoma State
Employment decreased by 0.3 percent in the period studied
according to State Policy Reports.
- Nationally, state
employment grew at an average of 5.1 percent.
- Texas state employment
grew at a 13.3 percent clip. North Carolina state
employment grew at 11.2 percent.
- Oklahoma state
government has 4,132 fewer state employees (non-higher
ed) than the state did in 1993, according to the March
FTE report published by the Office of State Finance. This
represents greater than a 10 percent decrease in state
employment.
- There were 552 fewer FTE
in the executive, legislative and judiciary in March of
1995 than there were at the beginning of the FY'95 fiscal
year in July. This represents a 1.4 percent decrease in
the state workforce in the first 8 eight months of the
FY'95 fiscal year.
Corrections Employment
Growth Masks Even More Impressive
Reductions Elsewhere In State Government
What makes Oklahoma's
downsizing marks even more impressive is that during the
period since 1990 employment of corrections workers in the
state grew by 291 FTE, or more than 7 percent.
The growth in Corrections employees has been a long
term trend in Oklahoma. From FY'85 to FY'94 Oklahoma had
explosive growth in correctional employees as Oklahoma's
incarceration rate became the highest in the country.
- Oklahoma employed 1056
more corrections employees in FY'94 than did the state in
FY'85.
- Corrections employment
growth was 55.2 percent for that time period.
- Despite this increase in
Corrections employees, Oklahoma still has the highest
ratio of inmates to correctional officers in the nation
according to the 1994 Criminal Justice Institute
Yearbook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1990 to
November 1994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank
|
|
State
|
|
Percent
|
|
Rank
|
|
State
|
|
Percent
|
|
Rank
|
|
State
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
South
Carolina
|
|
25.5%
|
|
18
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
7.3%
|
|
34
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Idaho
|
|
19.0%
|
|
19
|
|
Indiana
|
|
7.0%
|
|
35
|
|
Oregon
|
|
1.9%
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Utah
|
|
18.2%
|
|
20
|
|
Montana
|
|
6.9%
|
|
36
|
|
Alaska
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Georgia
|
|
16.5%
|
|
21
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
6.6%
|
|
37
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
New
Mexico
|
|
13.5%
|
|
22
|
|
North
Dakota
|
|
6.4%
|
|
38
|
|
Iowa
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Texas
|
|
13.3%
|
|
23
|
|
Vermont
|
|
5.9%
|
|
39
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Nevada
|
|
13.2%
|
|
24
|
|
Virginia
|
|
5.9%
|
|
40
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
North
Carolina
|
|
11.2%
|
|
25
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
5.2%
|
|
41
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
-0.3%
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
10.8%
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
5.1%
|
|
42
|
|
Ohio
|
|
-0.6%
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
10.7%
|
|
26
|
|
New
Hampshire
|
|
4.9%
|
|
43
|
|
Illinois
|
|
-1.1%
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Washington
|
|
10.1%
|
|
27
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
4.8%
|
|
44
|
|
Michigan
|
|
-1.6%
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
10.0%
|
|
28
|
|
South
Dakota
|
|
0.046
|
|
45
|
|
New
Jersey
|
|
-2.8%
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
West
Virginia
|
|
9.6%
|
|
29
|
|
Missouri
|
|
3.9%
|
|
46
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
-4.5%
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
8.8%
|
|
30
|
|
Delaware
|
|
3.6%
|
|
47
|
|
New York
|
|
-5.9%
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Alabama
|
|
8.7%
|
|
31
|
|
Maryland
|
|
2.9%
|
|
48
|
|
Rhode
Island
|
|
-9.9%
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Florida
|
|
8.5%
|
|
32
|
|
California
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Colorado
|
|
7.4%
|
|
33
|
|
Maine
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
Data not available for Kansas and Arizona
Source: State Policy Reports, Vol. 13, Issue 2, January
1995
|