RURAL HOUSING INCENTIVE
STUDY
TASK FORCE REPORT - JANUARY 2001
TO: Governor Frank Keating
President Pro Tempore Stratton Taylor
Speaker Larry Adair
Senator Ted Fisher
Representative Dale Turner
FROM: Russell Sossaman, Chairman, Rural Housing
Task Force
RE: Rural Housing Task Force Report
On behalf of the Rural Housing Task Force I am pleased to transmit our
final report for your consideration.
As you know, HB 2434, authored by Senator
Fisher and Representative Turner, called for the appointment of a task
force to determine what housing needs exist in rural Oklahoma and to make
recommendations which would enhance the development of housing in rural
areas.
As you are well aware, the lack of affordable
housing in rural Oklahoma is a serious issue in our state and must be
addressed if we are to continue the economic growth Oklahoma is now experiencing.
It is obvious to me that the committee did
not take the task lightly, and gave strong importance to attempting to
solve the housing crisis in rural Oklahoma.
The final recommendations are included in
this report. Some will require legislative action and others will require
cooperation and coordination among housing providers and developers.
In summary, the recommendations include:
- identifying the number and the type of
housing needed in rural Oklahoma
- recommended incentives which will cause
the development of needed housing in rural areas
- increasing the assistance available to
rural communities and developers in order to create new housing
- Renewable financing for the state Housing
Trust Fund
The development of new decent and affordable
housing in Oklahoma is a critical issue for every growing community's
economic development as well as the health and happiness of Oklahoma's
families. We hope that the report will be of assistance in your efforts
to help communities and businesses in Oklahoma to prosper.
SUMMARY
REPORT
RURAL HOUSING TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
REQUIRES LEGISLATIVE ACTION:
- Find a permanent source for significant
funding for the Housing Trust Fund.
- Reallocate the state bond cap allocations
with a greater emphasis on housing in rural areas.
- Develop targeted programs/funds for housing
in rural areas
1. State tax credit for rural housing developers
2. Tax credits to employers that participate in down payment programs
3. Develop incentives for infill housing development in rural towns
4. Use enterprise zones for incentives to build housing
- Increase the dollars and staff who would
be involved in pro-active housing development in rural communities.
- State should update definitions of various
types of alternative housing structures. These updated definitions can
then be used by municipalities to modernize the municipal codes if necessary.
COORDINATION AND/OR POLICY
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Conduct a 77 county market analysis/state
housing needs assessment. Supply this information to the sub-state planning
districts through the CIP (Capital Improvement Planning) Program. The
information should be made available to banks, cities, developers and
other relevant parties.
- Encourage municipalities to modernize
zoning codes to allow the use of alternative housing methods.
- Increase home-buyer education programs
and awareness.
- Encourage all state agencies with housing
resources to examine their allocations and resources for rentals, rehabs
and homeownership for maximum impact.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Create a pro-active housing development
program to assist rural cities/towns in developing housing.
- Increase funding and staff to entities
involved in rural housing.
- Simplify the application process for federal
housing programs administered by state agencies.
- Encourage existing housing programs to
focus on infill housing.
TASK FORCE MEMBERS*
Senate Appointees:
Congressional District #1: Owen
(Chip) Ard, Tulsa
Congressional District #2: Ron
Smith, Sapulpa
Congressional District #3: Greg
Massey, Durant
Congressional District #4: Kay
Absher, Norman
Congressional District #5: E.
Allen Cowen II, Oklahoma City
Congressional District #6: Harold
Gleason, Thomas
House of Representatives Appointees:
Congressional District #1: Doug Wilken, Tulsa
Congressional District #2: Bryan Burrows, Wagoner
Congressional District #3: Russell Sossaman, Hugo
Congressional District #4: Leo Fallon, Frederick
Congressional District #5: Steve Harry, Sr., OKC
Congressional District #6: LaVern Phillips, Woodward
Governor's Appointees:
Congressional District #1: Gaylyn Haynes, Tulsa
Congressional District #2: Bill Johnson, Muskogee
Congressional District #3: Chris Harden, Shawnee
Congressional District #4: Linda Price, Norman
Congressional District #5: Rex Smitherman, Oklahoma City
Congressional District #6: Jess Nelson, Guymon
Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency:
Dennis Shockley - Executive Director of OHFA
* Task Force members were appointed
pursuant to the requirements of HB 2434 enacted in May 2000 and codified
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 2902 of Title 74 which created the
Rural Housing Incentive Study Task Force.
Rural Housing Incentive
Study
Task Force Report
House Bill 2434 enacted in May 2000 and codified
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 2909 of Title 74, created the Rural
Housing Incentive Study Task Force.
Task Force Composition
The Task Force is composed of:
- Six members appointed by the governor
- Six members appointed by the Speaker of
the Oklahoma House of Representatives
- Six members appointed by the President
Pro Tempore of the Oklahoma Senate
- One member appointed by a majority of
the Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency
Appointees represented all six US Congressional
districts within Oklahoma and were selected by the appointing authorities
based on their experience in housing such as:
- Private and public finance
- Construction of single and multi-family
housing
- Federal or state tax and related incentives
- Other experience or expertise in housing
related enterprises
The listing of Task Force appointees is provided
as Exhibit #1.
Task Force Purpose
The charge of the Task Force was to study
the existing federal, state and local incentives and programs available
to private developers and private sources of capital for the construction
or acquisition of single and multifamily dwellings in rural areas. Additionally,
the Task Force was to review county market conditions to determine the
need for rural housing units.
Housing Conditions In Oklahoma
In 1998, a joint study, performed by the
Oklahoma Department of Commerce and the Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency
of fourteen rural Oklahoma counties across the state, revealed the demand
for 10,596 single-family units with sales prices mostly below $70,000
and a demand for 3,849 rental units. Additionally, the study reveals that
the rural markets are very active in all price ranges: average listing
terms are relatively short and list and sales prices are relatively the
same.
From 1990 to 2000, Oklahoma's population
has grown by 9.7% according to data from the 2000 U.S. Census. Oklahoma
experienced a total population growth of over 300,000 residents, from
3.1 million in 1990, to the current 2000 population of over 3.4 million.
Over the same period of time, approximately 240,000 new jobs have also
been created throughout the state. As a result, additional housing must
be created to accommodate this growth in the state.
Findings
The Task Force held three meetings in the
Fall of 2000. These meetings resulted in findings summarized into three
core areas:
The identification of rural housing
issues (Exhibit #2):
- Lack of Strategic Planning
- Housing Development Costs Are Problematic
- There is a Lack of Borrower's Capital
- There is a Lack of Available Housing Inventory
A summary of existing resources and
resource gaps that inhibit rural housing development (Exhibit #3). Those
gaps include:
- Policy
- State incentives
- Market analysis
- Increased funding
- Information clearinghouse
- Technical assistance
- Reallocation of the bond cap
Proposed recommendations for action:
- Legislative actions
- Coordination and/or policy recommendations
- Technical assistance
Proposed Recommendations
The three core recommendations made by the
Task Force are:
- Take legislative action where necessary.
- Make coordination and/or policy changes
in the state's approach to rural housing development.
- Provide rural communities with technical
assistance.
The details for each recommendation are delineated
below along with the Task Force's recommendations regarding the entities
that should assume lead roles in the execution of the various actions.
Legislative Actions
- Find a permanent significant source of
funding for the Housing Trust Fund.
- Reallocate the state bond cap allocations
with a greater emphasis on housing in rural areas.
- Develop targeted programs/funds for housing
in rural areas:
- State tax credit for rural housing developers
- Tax credits to employers that participate in down payment programs
- Develop incentives for infill housing development in rural towns
- Use enterprise zones for incentives to build housing
- Increase the dollars and staff who would
be involved in pro-active housing development in rural communities.
- State should update definitions of various
types of alternative housing structures. Updated definitions can then
be used by municipalities to modernize the municipal codes if necessary.
Coordination and/or Policy
Recommendations |
Responsible Entity |
Conduct a 77 county market analysis/state
housing needs assessment. Supply this
information to the sub-state planning
districts through the CIP (Capital Improvement
Planning) Program. The information should be
made available to banks, cities, developers
and other relevant parties. |
OHFA/ODOC |
Encourage municipalities to modernize
zoning codes to allow the use of
alternative housing methods |
OML |
Increase home-buyer education
programs and awareness |
OAACAA, OML |
Encourage all state agencies
with
housing resources to examine
their allocations and resources for
rental, rehab and homeowner for
maximum impact |
OHFA, ODOC,
DHS |
Technical Assistance
Recommendations: |
Responsible
Entity |
Create a pro-active housing
development
program to assist rural cities/towns in
developing housing. Increase funding and
staff to entities involved in rural housing |
OHFA,ODOC,FHLB,
SSPD's, CHDOs, OML |
| |
|
Simplify the application
process for
federal housing programs administered
by state agencies |
OHFA, ODOC |
| |
|
Encourage existing housing
programs
to focus on infill housing |
OHFA, OML, HUD, CHDOs, FHLB
|
EXHIBITS
Exhibit #1
TASK FORCE MEMBERS*
Senate Appointees:
Congressional District #1: Owen
(Chip) Ard, Tulsa
Congressional District #2: Ron
Smith, Sapulpa
Congressional District #3: Greg
Massey, Durant
Congressional District #4: Kay
Absher, Norman
Congressional District #5: E.
Allen Cowen II, Oklahoma City
Congressional District #6: Harold
Gleason, Thomas
House of Representatives Appointees:
Congressional District #1: Doug Wilken, Tulsa
Congressional District #2: Bryan Burrows, Wagoner
Congressional District #3: Russell Sossaman, Hugo
Congressional District #4: Leo Fallon, Frederick
Congressional District #5: Steve Harry, Sr., OKC
Congressional District #6: LaVern Phillips, Woodward
Governor's Appointees:
Congressional District #1: Gaylyn Haynes, Tulsa
Congressional District #2: Bill Johnson, Muskogee
Congressional District #3: Chris Harden, Shawnee
Congressional District #4: Linda Price, Norman
Congressional District #5: Rex Smitherman, Oklahoma City
Congressional District #6: Jess Nelson, Guymon
Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency:
Dennis Shockley - Executive Director of OHFA
*
Task Force members were appointed pursuant to the requirements of HB 2434
enacted in May 2000 and codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 2902
of Title 74 which created the Rural Housing Incentive Study Task Force.
Exhibit
#2
| To: |
Russell Sossamon, Chair;
Jess Nelson, Vice Chair;
Senator Ted Fisher; Representative Dale Turner;
Rural Housing Incentive Study Task Force Members |
| |
|
| From: |
Byron DeBruler, OHFA facilitator |
| |
|
| Subject: |
Facilitation Results from
First Task Force Meeting |
| |
|
| Date: |
9/21/00 |
Agenda item two resulted in
the identification of the rural housing issues below. The general consensus
of the Task Force is that the issues are present in some combination in
all Congressional Districts of our state.
Lack of Strategic Planning
Cities and towns are often
not involved in the development of housing solutions.
There are limited personnel resources at the local level.
There is a need to identify and educate community teams in order
to establish dreams of homeownership.
There needs to be an appropriate identification of communities
with need.
Housing Development Costs Are Problematic
Infrastructure development costs are high.
The cost of development is higher in rural areas.
There is a lack of ready to build platted lots with infrastructure.
There are up-front costs associated with development.
There are volumes of substandard rental and ownership units.
There is a Lack of Borrower's Capital
Acceptable financing is a struggle for some older homes that are
available for starter units due to their age and condition.
The financing of suitable units is not always available in cities
of less than 2,000 population particularly for young families.
Families are not able to afford "front monies" to buy
homes.
Cost vs. ability to pay is a problem.
The up-front cost of home purchase is a problem for low-and-moderate
income homebuyers.
There is a Lack of Available Housing Inventory
There is a lack of availability of affordable housing.
There is a lack of quality housing in rural Oklahoma.
There is a need for more housing in order to attract industrial
development.
There is a need for in-fill housing.
The existing housing stock is old.
There is a Need for Synergy Between Housing
Resources
There is a lack of state funding.
Production of housing units.
There is a lack of developers/builders.
There is a lack of development.
There is not enough affordable units being built.
There needs to be a critical mass.
There needs to be tandem development between employment and the
availability of housing.
Exhibit #3
Report of Data from Rural
Housing Incentive Study Task Force
October 5, 2000---Second Meeting
Task Force Mandated Output:
By December 31, 2000 produce a written report of findings and conclusion
regarding incentives or programs available for the construction or acquisition
of dwellings in rural areas. Recommend changes in existing State or political
subdivision policies or programs affecting the availability of affordability
of rural housing.
Forced Field Analysis of
Problem
Goal:
Available &
affordable housing
in rural OK |
______________________________________________________________ |
|
Lack of
Strategic
planning
|
Problematic
housing
dev. costs
|
Lack of
borrower's
capital
|
Lack of
available
inventory
|
Need for
synergy between
housing
resources
|
Present
Situation:
Unavailable |
______________________________________________________________ |
|
Policy
|
Market
analysis
|
State
incentives
|
Increased
funding
|
Info.
clearing
house
|
Technical
assistance
|
Reallocation
of bond cap
|
Vision of the goal realized
*Repository-central
spot for information locally
*Stabilized rural economy-stable communities; people living where
work
*Less haphazard funding system supports "dream"
*Seeing no vacant, sub-standard housing;
boarded-up houses
*Neighborhoods
*Rental housing procedures different
*People realize they can be home owners
*Housing & education assists to those who have a
dream of a home
*Aging homes are available that are maintained & rehabilitated
*Those who want a home not hampered anymore by $/cost
*Owners educated on upkeep
|
*Increased
# of one-stop centers
*Contractors building in response to demand
*OK state law modeled after FL's that makes a
funded trust fund
*Everyone who wants a home has one
*Employers can find housing for prospective
employees
*Everyone housed to own satisfaction
*Employees will be able to afford housing on their incomes
*People renting-safe, affordable rentals
*Housing costs don't exceed 30% of personal
(adjusted?) income
*See no vacant lots in communities; in-filled homes
*Starter units/local source/office |
What resources already
exist in part or in whole that address the five issues?
[# indicates the "votes" each item received
| Lack of strategic planning |
Lack of strategic planning,
continued |
*Sub-state
planning districts - 12
*OHFA - 11
*OK Municipal League - 10
*CHDOs/CAAs - 9
*State data center (at Commerce) - 6
*Local banks - 6
*Chambers of Commerce - 6
*OHEA - 5
*Cities' condemnation process - 4
*Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) - 4
*OSU/OU & other colleges (evaluate housing
construction options - 3
*COGs; Substate Planning District - 2
*FHLB - 2
*HUD Community Builders - 1
*Private consultants - 1
*OCI - 1
*City CD departments - 1
*Home buyer education (central grant at
Community Action Agency) - 1
*Citizen participation - 1
*HUD technical assistance (Allan Borut) - 1
|
*Council
of Governments
*Local comm groups
*Tribes
*USDA-RD Council
*USDA-Self-help housing
*OSU extension offices
*Certified Cities committees
*Main Street organizations
*SSPD/COA
*Local Ed groups
*CDBG T/A planning grants
*Enterprise Foundation
*ODOC-ROT
*Utility CD groups
|
| Lack of Available Housing
Inventory |
Lack of Available Housing
Inventory, cont. |
*Vacant
lots (infill) - 15
*Existing public/private development resources - 14
*Modular home builders(manufactured houses;
evaluate best system) - 13
*Existing affordable builders/developers - 11
*2nd Floor of Main Street buildings - 9
*Expand CIP inventory to include houses - 5
*Existing substandard housing stock (rehab) - 5
*Vacant existing downtown buildings & schools - 5
*Manufactured housing suppliers - 5 |
*Vacant
hospitals/motels - 1
*FHA 203K - 1
*Volunteers to rehab & rebuild - 1
*Empty or underused college dormitories
|
| Housing Development Costs
Are Problematic |
Need for Synergy Between
Housing Resources |
*Infill
lots - 15
*Resources available in OK Housing
Resources Guide - 11
*Employer contributions - 10
*City resources - 7
*Community Action Agencies - 7
*OHFA - 6
*CHDO - 5
*State CDBG - 4
*Financial institutions - 4
*Housing authorities - 3
*Universities - 3
*Lease paybacks to developers - 2
*HUD - 2
*Cost beneficial partnerships - 2
*Assessment dist - 2
*FHLB - 1
*OK Rural Development Council - 1
*Prisons
*Volunteers
*Technical training
*HAC
*OWRB
*TIFD
*RWDs |
*State
agency guidance (OHFA, Commerce) - 12
*HUD technical assistance - 9
*Community Housing Development
Organizations (CHDOs) - 7
*OHFA/Chambers of Commerce - 7
*Towns have affordable lots with infrastructure in place - 6
*Tax credits (State?) - 6
*State Housing Trust Fund - 5
*Central source for housing option information
(OHFA) - 3
*Town's local resources for cash match - 3
*HUD community builders - 3
*OK Association of Community Action Agencies - 2
*HOME funds - 2
*FNMA - 2
*Local employers want to participate in housing - 2
*Partnership facilitation - 2
*Banks - 1
*OK Home of Your Own - 1
*Board of Realtors
*NOAH
*Technology
*Local employers |
| Lack of Borrower's Capital |
Lack of Borrower's Capital
(continued) |
*Grant
and loan programs for first time home
buyers - 19
*City + housing authority subsidies/land
contribution - 17
*Employer Assistance Programs (EAP) - 7
*Fannie, Freddie, Ginnie - 7
*OK Housing Resource Guide - 6
*Local banks & CRA - 5
*Vo-Techs (Career & Tech. Ed. Centers) home
owner education - 4
*Local bond issues - 3 |
*FHLB
- 3
*CHDO proceeds - 2
*CAAs' programs - 2
*Lease purchase programs - 2
*FHA/VA&RD - 2
*IDAs - 2
*Section 8 - 1
*CDCs - 1
*HUD - 1
*Local & OHFA MRB/DPA - 1
*SBA
*Meta Fund |
What solutions do you propose
to fill the gap between the existing situation and your vision of the
goal realized (e.g., propose enhanced use of existing resources, new incentives,
new ideas, best practices, changes, etc.)?
|
Policy
|
State Incentives
|
Market
Analysis
|
Increased
Funding
|
*Eliminate State
centralized procurement/
purchasing procedures
*Lesson standards for slow payers
*De-politicize funding selection process
*Analyze distribution of funds between ownership vs rentals
*Home buyer education on home up-keep & home ownership
*[State to allow] Flexibility on all federal income limits for rural
areas
*Modernize zoning codes to allow modular homes
|
*State tax credit
for rural developers
*State tax credits
*Tax credits to employers that participate in down payment programs
*Incentives for infill housing development
*Seed $ for modular housing plants
*State loan guarantees (take-outs)
*Use Enterprise Zones
|
*Coordination of
supply and demand
*State housing needs assessment
*Conduct 77-county market analysis using CIP process
*Market analysis involving local communities to OHFA
*Listing of vacancies within Housing Authorities
*Study of alternative housing methods
|
*Fund the Housing
Trust Fund
*Infuse major $ into State Housing Trust Fund--$25million
*Expand OHFA mandate/programs
*Communities develop matching funds for grants
*Reserve & target State programs/funds for rural areas
|
| Information Clearing
House |
Technical Assistance |
Reallocation
of Bond Cap |
*Create a statewide
centralized agency or department for a source of assistance for rural
housing needs
*Simplify application process
*One stop shop
*Create more user friendly programs for business
*Develop unfinished subdivisions
|
*Housing circuit
rider (regional, local, district)
*Use Substate Planning Districts to initiate local housing planning
*Free up money so expertise can be linked
*State provide technical assistance to Housing Authorities to create
non-profit housing development agencies
|
*Dedication of larger
bond cap to housing
*Bond cap dedicated to rural
*More MRBs (rural)
*Use mortgage credit certificates
|
|